Will P.E.A.C.E. really come on the earth before Jesus returns?
Did Jesus say that His church would bring peace to the earth? That concept cannot be found in scripture. What Jesus did say is:
Mat 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
36 And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
Christians need more discernment not more gurus with humanistic dominionist dreams
It is high time that the Church went back to the basics and studied the scriptures for themselves and stopped being led by the nose by gurus who publish their latest whim.
Recently Rick Warren caused an uproar by going to Syria where he was taped praising the antichristian dictator of this terrorist nation. Warren has future plans to go to North Korea. One might wonder how Warren gets access to these rogue nations. Warren is a member of the ultra elite Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Could it be that what is being espoused in some evangelical circles are doctrines of men or demons that have been deceptively weaved into the fabric of the many colored garments that are now displayed on the backs of multitudes of Christian dummies?
For the full article go to:
http://www.thepropheticyears.com/comments/Globel%20Peace%20plan.htm
To me…one of most important statements in the above article is “Warren is a member of the ultra elite Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).”
What is the CFR and why is it important here? The CFR created in part the Social Gospel, so the fact that Rick Warren has proclaimed to be a member of this elite organization is very significant.
Here is his statement made to Joseph Farah:
“Warren explained that he had also counseled with the National Security Council and the White House, as well as the State Department, before his little courtesy call for a neighbor.”
”In fact,” Warren added, ”as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Oxford Analytica, I might know as much about the Middle East as you.”
One of the main goals of the CFR is to create a gospel that is favorable toward a world government. There are many in government today and past who are members. Just to name a few in no particular order…… Eisenhower, Cohen, Feinsten, Mondale, McGovern, Lieberman, Bentson, Carter, Bush, Clinton, Gore, Powell, McNamara, Rumsfeld, Rockefeller, Nixon, Albright Humphrey, J.P. Morgan, Gephartd, Gingrich, Kissinger, Cheney…it goes on and on. Take a look at the list at the below link.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/cfr-members.htm
The public knows what the CFR wants the public to know about the CFR, and nothing more.
Dr. Quigley knew a lot about the behind-the-scenes work of global power because he was a part of that power network for most of his life. In his book, Tragedy and Hope, Quigley states:
The “Hope” in the title of Quigley’s book represents the thousand-year reign of a collectivist one-world society which will be created when the “network” achieves its goal of world government. Quigley believed that the “network” is so powerful at this point that resistance by the common people is futile. Hence, those who resist the schemes of the globalist planners represent the “Tragedy.” By Dr. Quigley’s logic, there is no point in struggling against the noose around our necks, because resistance will merely guarantee strangulation.
According to Dr. Quigley, the Council on Foreign Relations is one of several front organizations set up by the network’s inner circle to advance its schemes. The ultimate goal: a New World Order.
http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/cfr_whitewash_commission.htm
The late Admiral Chester Ward, who resigned from the CFR in disgust after being a member for 16 years, was not exaggerating when he charged that the group’s agenda is to promote “disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.” The leadership of the group, he said, “is composed of the one-world-global-government ideologists � more respectfully referred to as the organized internationalists.”
http://herescope.blogspot.com/2006/12/social-gospel-60.html
The CFR and the Social Gospel: Part 4
The concept of “peace” was re-defined so that it contained the added meaning of an international new world order by the architects of the United Nations, many of whom were leaders in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). John Foster Dulles led the way in this effort, writing a concept paper entitled “The Problem of Peace in a Dynamic World” presented to the World Conference of Life and Work at Oxford in 1937.
“…Dulles… stated that he looked to Church leaders in particular to guide the world into a peaceful future.” (p. 86)“…[H]e challenged a new generation of pastors to guide their future congregations into the unfamiliar terrain of a new world order as the only sure hope of peace.” (p. 88) [emphases added]
These CFR leaders contrived to manipulate a new Christian ethic and era of “peace” by creating a new doctrinal ideal – that of building the kingdom of God on earth. This doctrine would serve as the foundation upon which international peace could be built.
****************
Have you ever heard of Peter Drucker’s 3-legged stool? The three legs of the stool are…government, business, and churches. These three sectors of society must be joined or partnered to facilitate the New World Order. You can see today how the church is becoming involved with businessess, (starbucks) using advertising and marketing methods, (bring in the customer) and government (the patriotric movement) on the superficial level. On a deeper level Peter Drucker’s networking management genius is being implemented into the church and is helping to create a dominion-based kingdom here on earth.
Who are two of Druckers prominate protege’s? Rick Warren and Bob Buford.
I am reading the Dec 06 Interchange Postings Summary for the P.E.A.C.E. Briefing for Mission Agencies, held by the Saddleback PEACE team in Atlanta GA. Here are two statements:
“We must take everything we have learned [about missions] in the past centuries and infuse it in and through the local church.”
“The specific components of this Summit are still being finalized, but the goal is to bring togther many of the key P.E.A.C.E. players from churches, businessess, agencies, and government for information and interaction.”
The above statement taken from the Saddleback Church Briefing defines exactly the same goal as Drucker’s 3-legged stool, which is the incorporation of the main segments of society into the church.
Let’s take another look at this statement taken from Herescope:
“…[H]e challenged a new generation of pastors to guide their future congregations into the unfamiliar terrain of a new world order as the only sure hope of peace.” (p. 88) [emphases added]
So.. (a CFR leader) is challenging pastors (Rick Warren… a CFR member) to guide future congregations (us) into the New World Order as the only sure hope of peace.
Clearly we can see that Rick Warren has been pretty effective to date. He has one of the largest congregations in the United States and he has implemented a huge undertaking with the P.E.A.C.E. Plan. He is using the “40 Days” programs as a way of inserting his agenda into the churches and pulling them along right into the next phase as they go.
First, bring the people into the congregations by a social and weak gospel message by appealing to their desires instead of their need for the true gospel. Second, “bring together many of the key P.E.A.C.E. players from churches, businessess, agencies, and government for information and interaction”. Third…..?
Will the mega-churches unite? Is the mega-church of today to be part of the one-world church of tomorrow? Is the true mission of the P.E.A.C.E. plan to feed the poor? I wish it was. But when looking at the Big Picture…I see how the networking, the blending of the three segments of our society…is creating a church for all mankind… a church with no gospel message…a blending of all other religions with Christiantity…a new universal religious system full of mystic practices. A new religion for the New World Order. Do you see it? It is happening before our very eyes.
kim
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 1, 2007 at 7:58 am
arm5
Maybe, this will be one of the thing that will usher in the Antichrist.
October 1, 2007 at 8:03 am
Kim
Yes, i think you maybe right!
October 5, 2007 at 8:01 am
Mark
Mega-churches are taking away members of the smaller churches. I attended an emergent church a few Sundays and witnessed the mysticism and the “watered-down-lack-of-conviction” sermons. In my opinion, Rick Warren, CFR, illegal Federal Reserve (who also control the media), and all the shareholder families of the FED, contribute to “using” distorted religion as a tool to achieve the goal of one world domination. We’re doomed here on earth.
October 6, 2007 at 12:54 am
Kim
When i started learning about what was going on behind the scenes it took awhile for it to sink in. Yes we are doomed here on earth, but we have an eternal hope in Jesus Christ.
October 17, 2007 at 4:16 am
IWanthetruth
Something I did not touch on before in the earlier correspondence but will now–in response to [ ]–is that it appears one of the many underlying characteristics of PDL is the not too subtle undermining of the
sufficiency of the Word of God (Bible). The Reformers were ready to die for that hill–sola scriptura! Since the introduction of modern psychological techniques (by men who unquestionably were humanistic in their anthropology and therefore hostile to the suggestion of divine inspiration) there has been a steady eroding of the sufficiency of the biblical text for faith and practice. PDL is an obvious illustration of this trend, but by no means a solitary one. The truth is the sufficiency of the Bible has been under attack since the Enlightenment in Europe during the
end of the middle ages. It has only been recently (20th century to
the present) that the momentum has reached critical mass to the end that churches in droves are jettisoning the Bible in place of
extra-biblical resources. The phenomena ought not to come as a huge surprise, however, because it has Satan’s fingerprints all over it. Recall back in Eden at the temptation: “Did God really say?” and “Surely you will not die….” Those statements seek to undermine all four essentials of
divine revelation: inspiration, in errancy, authority, and yes,
sufficiency. Interesting times in which we live!
November 17, 2007 at 10:48 am
Lee
I just posted this at “Crisis in the Church” and thought I’d repost here:
Just yesterday I was listening to our local Christian talk radio station. I came in mid-message and had no idea who was speaking. The basic subject was the orphans in Africa — those orphaned primarily because of AIDS. He stressed the importance of giving to orphans — a worthy goal, of course. However, he stressed it to the point of it being one of the main goals, if not THE primary goal, of the Christian.
Within the message he used the New Age buzzword “global” quite a few times. Then the shocker came. I’ll have to paraphrase as I don’t recall the exact words, but it was something to the effect that it’s the church which has the means and the church’s responsibility to redistribute wealth! This, of course, is the goal of New Agers and is indicative of the Antichrist (Revelation 13).
Who was speaking? It was none other than Rick Warren of whom Rupert Murdoch commented [paraphrased], “He’s the most global thinking man I know.” Murdoch referred to Warren as his personal pastor. Is Murdoch saved? Here’s an interesting article:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55616